<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Australian Christian Lobby</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chester4solomon.com/posts/the-australian-christian-lobby/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chester4solomon.com/posts/the-australian-christian-lobby/</link>
	<description>The Liberty &#38; Democracy Candidate for Solomon</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 19:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jacques Chester for Solomon &#187; ACL forum report</title>
		<link>http://chester4solomon.com/posts/the-australian-christian-lobby/#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacques Chester for Solomon &#187; ACL forum report</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 01:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chester4solomon.com/posts/the-australian-christian-lobby/#comment-64</guid>
		<description>[...] night I went along to the forum organised by the Australian Christian Lobby. I&#8217;ve already talked about some of the questions here on the site a bit, so I will try to focus more on the evening [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] night I went along to the forum organised by the Australian Christian Lobby. I&#8217;ve already talked about some of the questions here on the site a bit, so I will try to focus more on the evening [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacques Chester</title>
		<link>http://chester4solomon.com/posts/the-australian-christian-lobby/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacques Chester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 13:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chester4solomon.com/posts/the-australian-christian-lobby/#comment-56</guid>
		<description>Good thinking, Kirk. I'll try and pitch myself that way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good thinking, Kirk. I&#8217;ll try and pitch myself that way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kirk Fletcher</title>
		<link>http://chester4solomon.com/posts/the-australian-christian-lobby/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirk Fletcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 12:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chester4solomon.com/posts/the-australian-christian-lobby/#comment-55</guid>
		<description>&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;It should prove to be an interesting evening, not least because I like John Humphreys will not bring much in the way of soothing words or pork-barreling. I come as a blunt libertarian for whom the role of government is very limited&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

On the gay marriage issue, I mentioned that we would not oppose it, but also talked about anti-vilification and sex discrimination laws.  I did this NOT to soothe them or to “soften the blow” - but because I know these are real concerns that they have: they are genuinely worried that ministers might be forced to conduct gay marriages, or that christian schools will be forced to employ gays, etc…

And this is where you have a chance to sell libertarianism as a philosophy - by pointing out that the real danger is in government intervention in personal decisions. Though they may like some sorts of intervention (eg, banning gay marriage), once they accept that involvement they abdicate their right to make choices for themselves - and it won’t be the only sort of intervention they receive.

It’s a hard sell… but some people are open to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>It should prove to be an interesting evening, not least because I like John Humphreys will not bring much in the way of soothing words or pork-barreling. I come as a blunt libertarian for whom the role of government is very limited</i></p>
<p>On the gay marriage issue, I mentioned that we would not oppose it, but also talked about anti-vilification and sex discrimination laws.  I did this NOT to soothe them or to “soften the blow” - but because I know these are real concerns that they have: they are genuinely worried that ministers might be forced to conduct gay marriages, or that christian schools will be forced to employ gays, etc…</p>
<p>And this is where you have a chance to sell libertarianism as a philosophy - by pointing out that the real danger is in government intervention in personal decisions. Though they may like some sorts of intervention (eg, banning gay marriage), once they accept that involvement they abdicate their right to make choices for themselves - and it won’t be the only sort of intervention they receive.</p>
<p>It’s a hard sell… but some people are open to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
